From bmb@bmbolstad.com Sat Aug 1 21:11:42 2009 Return-Path: <bmb@bmbolstad.com> Delivered-To: pingou@pingoured.fr Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 1 Aug 2009 21:11:42 -0000 Received: from nila.lunarpages.com (216.97.230.70) by mx0.ovh.net with SMTP; 1 Aug 2009 21:11:41 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bmbolstad.com) by nila.lunarpages.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bmb@bmbolstad.com>) id 1MXLrM-0002qg-Hn for pingou@pingoured.fr; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:11:20 -0700 Received: from 99.37.156.253 ([99.37.156.253]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user bmb@bmbolstad.com) by bmbolstad.com with HTTP; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:11:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <27028.99.37.156.253.1249161080.squirrel@bmbolstad.com> In-Reply-To: <1249158185.2765.3.camel@red.localdomain> References: <1249158185.2765.3.camel@red.localdomain> Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:11:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: preprocessCore license From: bmb@bmbolstad.com To: "Pierre-Yves" <pingou@pingoured.fr> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - nila.lunarpages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - pingoured.fr X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bmbolstad.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 12649766930274309798 X-Ovh-Remote: 216.97.230.70 (nila.lunarpages.com) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.32 (mx0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.5/N X-Evolution-Source: imap://pingou%40pingoured.fr@ssl0.ovh.net/ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The licence in the DESCRIPTION is the intended licence > Dear Mr, > > My name is Pierre-Yves Chibon and I am involved in the linux > distribution Fedora as packager. > I am particularly taking care of R package and I come to the point of > packaging your library preprocessCore for Fedora. > > In the process of review of the package [1] before its integration it > comes to the view of the reviewer that there are some contradiction in > the license of the library. > The description file mentions LGPL version 2 or later while several of > the C files in the src folder are under GPL version 2 or later. > > Could you please clarify the license of the library ? > > Thanks in advance for your help, > > Best regards, > > Pierre > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 > >
