<html>
<head>
<title>backport-util-concurrent - Distributed Computing Laboratory</title>
<meta content="java.util.concurrent backport">
</head>
<body>
<h1>backport-util-concurrent</h1>
<p>Backport of JSR 166 (java.util.concurrent) to Java 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and ... 5.0, and 6.0</p>
<p><a href="http://dcl.mathcs.emory.edu/util/backport-util-concurrent/">http://dcl.mathcs.emory.edu/util/backport-util-concurrent/</a></p>
<p>Release: 3.1, for Java 1.4</p>
<hr class="hide">
<h2>Overview</h2>
<p>
This package is the backport of
<a href="http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/concurrency-interest/">java.util.concurrent</a> API,
introduced in
<a href="http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/concurrency/overview.html">Java 5.0</a>
and further refined in Java 6.0,
to older Java platforms. The backport is based on public-domain sources from the
<a href="http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/main/java/">
JSR 166 CVS repository</a>, the
<a href="http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/classes/EDU/oswego/cs/dl/util/concurrent/intro.html">
dl.util.concurrent</a> package, and the Doug Lea's
<a href="http://gee.oswego.edu/dl/classes/collections/">
collections</a> package.
<p>
The ambition of this project is to provide a concurrency library that works with
uncompromised performance on all Java platforms currently in use,
allowing development of fully portable concurrent applications. OK, let's get
real - the traget scope is Java 1.3 and above, and some limited 1.2.
<p>
The backport is close to complete; unsupported functionality is
limited to: 1) classes that rely on explicit
JVM support and cannot be emulated at a satisfactory
performance level on platforms before 5.0, 2) some of the functions
described in the original javadoc as "designed primarily for use in
monitoring in system state, not for synchronization control".
</p>
<p>
The ultimate purpose of the backport is to enable gradual migration to java.util.concurrent.
In a perfect world, everybody would instantly and simultaneously upgrade to Java 6.0 once
it comes out. In reality, many people are, for various reasons, still stuck to older platforms.
The backport allows them to use the JSR 166 goodies without upgrading just yet.
And once they are ready to switch, their concurrency code will require only very minor
modifications, such as changing the import statements.
</p>
<p>Note: <a href="http://retrotranslator.sourceforge.net/">Retrotranslator</a>
in an interesting alternative to using the backport directly.</p>
<h3>Features</h3>
<p>
The following functionality of java.util.concurrent is supported in the backport:
<ul>
<li>All JSR 166 executors, utilities, and everything related (thread pools,
FutureTask, scheduled tasks and executors, etc.)</li>
<li>Locks: ReentrantLock, Semaphore, ReentrantReadWriteLock
(see <a href="compatibility.php">Compatibility</a>), Conditions</li>
<li>Queues: synchronous, array, linked, delay, and priority queues</li>
<li>Deques: array, and linked deques</li>
<li>Atomics: everything except reflection-based updaters</li>
<li>Other concurrency utils: CountDownLatch, CyclicBarrier, Exchanger</li>
<li>Concurrent collections: ConcurrentHashMap, CopyOnWriteArrayList, CopyOnWriteArraySet,
ConcurrentLinkedQueue,
ConcurrentSkipList[Map,Set]</li>
<li>Retrofitted standard collections</li>
</ul>
</p>
<h3>License</h3>
<p>
This software is released to the
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain">public domain</a>,
in the spirit of the original code written by Doug Lea.
The code can be used for any purpose, modified, and redistributed
without acknowledgment. No warranty is provided, either express or implied.
</p>
<p>
JSR 166 functionality is tied closely to the Java 5.0+ Virtual Machine, and some aspects of it
cannot be fully
backported to older platforms. This section discusses these differences between the backport and
JSR 166.
</p>
<h3>Package Names</h3>
<p>Since user libraries cannot define classes in
java.* packages, all the original package names have been prefixed with
<code>edu.emory.mathcs.backport</code>. For instance, <code>java.util.concurrent.Future</code> becomes <code>edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.Future</code>.
</p>
<h3>Differences between releases</h3>
<p>
The backport is based on latest JSR 166 source code and thus includes
functionality that has been added in Java 6.0.
Pay attention to the "since" javadoc tags if a strict conformance with Java 5.0
is desired. Examples of "since 1.6" functionality include:
deques, navigable maps and sets (including ConcurrentSkipList[Map,Set]),
"newTaskFor" in AbstractExecutorService,
"lazySet" in atomics, RunnableFuture and RunnableScheduledFuture,
"allowCoreThreadTimeout" in ThreadPoolExecutor,
"decorateTask" in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor, MINUTES, HOURS, and DAYS in TimeUnit,
and appropriate retrofits in collection classes.
</p>
<p>Backport is developed carefully to retain link-time compatibility, i.e. it is generally
safe to replace an old library JAR with a new one (with a possible exception of APIs
based on beta releases, e.g. current "since 1.6" classes and methods). Serial compatibility
(i.e. ability of
one version to deserialize objects that has been serialized using a different version)
is maintained on a best-effort basis, and not always guaranteed.
Please see details below. (Note that concurrency tools are usually not intended for
persistent storage anyway). Compile-time compatibility: applications using
wildcard imports (e.g. java.util.* and edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.*) may
cease to compile with updated backport versions (containing new classes)
due to import ambiguities. In such cases, you must dis-ambiguate
imports (i.e. use explicit imports as appropriate) and recompile.
</p>
<p>Notes for version 3.0-3.1:
Link-time and serial compatibility is fully preserved.</p>
<p>Notes for version 2.2:
Link-time and serial compatibility is fully preserved for "since 1.5" APIs. For
"since 1.6" APIs, link-time and serial compatibility is preserved except for
navigable maps and sets, which API has recently changed slightly in
Java 6.0 beta.
</p>
<p>Notes for version 2.1:
Link-time compatibility is preserved fully.
Serial compatibility is preserved except for the class ReentrantReadWriteLock.
</p>
<p>Notes for version 2.0:
<ul>
<li>the "concurrent.Concurrent" class has been removed as of backport 2.0.</li>
<li>Serialized representations
of several lock classes have changed between versions 1.1_01 and 2.0,
as a result of certain bug fixes and performance improvements (see changelog).
This means that locks and collections serialized with 1.1_01 will not be
deserialized properly by 2.0.
</li>
</ul>
</p>
<h3>Differences between versions for Java 1.2 - 1.3, 1.4, 5.0, and 6.0</h3>
Within the same release, backport versions optimized for Java 1.2 - 1.3, 1.4, 5.0, and 6.0, are source-level
and link-time compatible. That is, (1) sources compiled using one version will compile
using another version, and (2)
classes compiled with one version can be used with another version without
recompiling. However, they are not serially compatible - that is, objects
serialized using one version cannot be deserialized using another version.
<h3>Unsupported functionality</h3>
<p>
Detailed listing of functionality that has not been backported
is presented below.
</p>
<h4>Java 5.0 Syntax</h4>
<p>
Package java.util.concurrent exploits new language features
introduced in Java 5.0. In particular, most API classes are
<a href="http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/language/generics.html">generic types</a>.
In the backport, they have been flattened to standard, non-generic
classes. Still, programs linked against the backport should compile
with Java 5.0 (after changing package names). Nevertheless, you may
want to consider gradually switching to using generics once you make
the transition to Java 5.0, since it gives better compile-time
type checking.
</p>
<h4>In Condition</h4>
<p>
Method long awaitNanos(long nanosTimeout) is not supported, since the
emulation cannot reliably report remaining times with nanosecond
precision. Thus, it probably would be too dangerous to leave the
emulated method in the Condition interface. However, the method is
still available, for those who know what they are doing,
in the <a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/helpers/Utils.html">util.concurrent.helpers.Utils</a> class.
</p>
<h4>In ReentrantLock</h4>
<p>
the following monitoring methods are supported only for fair locks:
boolean hasQueuedThreads(), int getQueueLength(), Collection
getQueuedThreads(), boolean isQueued(), boolean hasWaiters(Condition),
int getWaitQueueLength(Condition),
Collection getWaitingThreads(Condition).
</p>
<h4>In ReentrantReadWriteLock</h4>
<p>
The backport implementation for Java 1.2 - 1.3 and 1.4 is based on dl.util.concurrent class
ReentrantWriterPreferenceReadWriteLock, and thus slightly departs
from java.util.concurrent that does not specify acquisition order but
allows to enable/disable fairness. The backport implementation does not
have a single-parameter constructor allowing to specify fairness policy;
it always behaves like writer-preference lock with no fairness
guarantees. Because of these characteristics, this class is compliant with JSR 166
specification of non-fair reentrant read-write locks, while the exact
semantics of fair locks are not supported (and the appropriate
constructor is thus not provided).
</p>
<p>
Also, the following instrumentation and status methods are not
supported: Collection getQueuedWriterThreads(), Collection
getQueuedReaderThreads(), boolean hasQueuedThreads(), boolean
hasQueuedThread(Thread), Collection getQueuedThreads(), boolean
hasWaiters(Condition), int getWaitQueueLength(Condition), Collection
getWaitingThreads(Condition).
</p>
<h4>In Semaphore</h4>
<p>
Blocking atomic multi-acquires: acquire(int permits)
and
tryAcquire(int permits, long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
are supported only for FAIR semaphores.
</p>
<h4>Platform-level functionality</h4>
<p>
To emulate System.nanoTime(), not present on JVM < 5.0, the method
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/helpers/Utils.html#nanoTime()">nanoTime()</a>
is provided in the class
dl.util.concurrent.helpers.Utils. On Java 1.4.2 and above, it attempts to use
high-precision timer via sun.misc.Perf (thanks to Craig Mattocks
for suggesting this). On older Java platforms, or when sun.misc.Perf
is not supported, it falls back to System.currentTimeMillis().
In the Java 5.0 and 6.0 version, it delegates to System.nanoTime().
</p>
<p>
Class <a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/helpers/ThreadHelpers.html">ThreadHelpers</a>
is provided to emulate certain aspects of Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler.
</p>
<h4>Note on nanosecond precision timing</h4>
<p>
The backport strives to honor nanosecond timeouts, if such are requested,
by using two-parameter variant of Object.wait() in Java 1.2 - 1.3 and 1.4 versions.
However, most
Java platforms will round up the timeout to full milliseconds anyway.
In Java 5.0 and 6.0 versions, the backport uses native nanosecond APIs.
</p>
<h4>Low-level concurrency classes</h4>
<p>
The following classes are not supported:
LockSupport, AbstractQueuedSynchronizer, AbstractQueuedLongSynchronizer.
</p><p><i>Rationale: </i> these classes depend on explicit
JVM support, delegating to low-level OS concurrency primitives. There seems
to be no simple way of emulating them without introducing prohibitive
performance overhead.
</p>
<h4>Atomic utilities</h4>
<p>
The following "atomic" utilities are not supported:
Atomic[Integer,Long,Reference]FieldUpdater.
<p><i>Rationale: </i> on many platforms, these utilities cannot be emulated
without a prohibitive overhead, negating their usefulness.
</p>
<p>
The backport has been around since December 2004. It has been downloaded
tens of thousands of times. It has been successfully used in many open-source
and commercial projects. Arguably, it has become a de-facto standard concurrency
library for Java 1.4, and by now, it is very well tested by its users.
</p>
<p>
Moreover, the backport is based on a very stable and robust code base of
JSR 166 and dl.util.concurrent. This
partially explains why so few bugs have been reported against it. Once again,
I would like to express gratitude to the JSR 166 expert group for doing such
a great job, and for their commitment to open source.
</p>
<h3>Unit tests</h3>
<p>
Version 3.1 of the library passes all the relevant 1859 unit tests from
<a href="http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/test/tck/">TCK test package</a>
designed for java.util.concurrent (the tests of unsupported functionality
were skipped).
</p>
<p>
The following unit tests have been completed (listed in the alphabetical order):
AbstractExecutorServiceTest,
AbstractQueueTest,
ArrayBlockingQueueTest,
ArrayDequeTest,
AtomicBooleanTest,
AtomicIntegerArrayTest,
AtomicIntegerTest,
AtomicLongArrayTest,
AtomicLongTest,
AtomicMarkableReferenceTest,
AtomicReferenceArrayTest,
AtomicReferenceTest,
AtomicStampedReferenceTest,
ConcurrentHashMapTest,
ConcurrentLinkedQueueTest,
ConcurrentSkipListMapTest,
ConcurrentSkipListSubMapTest,
ConcurrentSkipListSetTest,
ConcurrentSkipListSubSetTest,
CopyOnWriteArrayListTest,
CopyOnWriteArraySetTest,
CountDownLatchTest,
CyclicBarrierTest,
DelayQueueTest,
EntryTest,
ExchangerTest,
ExecutorsTest,
ExecutorCompletionServiceTest,
FutureTaskTest,
LinkedBlockingDequeTest,
LinkedBlockingQueueTest,
LinkedListTest,
PriorityBlockingQueueTest,
PriorityQueueTest,
ReentrantLockTest,
ReentrantReadWriteLockTest,
ScheduledExecutorTest,
ScheduledExecutorSubclassTest,
SemaphoreTest,
SynchronousQueueTest,
SystemTest (testing Utils.nanoTime()),
ThreadLocalTest,
ThreadPoolExecutorTest,
ThreadPoolExecutorSubclassTest,
TimeUnitTest,
TreeMapTest,
TreeSubMapTest,
TreeSetTest,
TreeSubSetTest.
</p>
<h3>Stress tests</h3>
<p>
The backport is being stress-tested using the "loops" tests from JSR 166
(courtesy of Doug Lea and the JSR 166 Expert Group). The tests, included
in the development source
bundle, thoroughly evaluate behavior and performance of various types
of locks, queues, maps, futures, and other API classes, under various
conditions (contention etc.) and circumstances, including cancellation.
</p>
<p>
Despite exhaustive testing, as any software, this library may still contain
bugs. If you find one, please report it, or better yet, contribute a fix.
</p>
<h3>Known problems</h3>
<p>
<strong>Note: </strong>A bug has been reported against Sun 1.4.2_04 JVMs, and fixed in
1.4.2_06 (see ID 4917709) that makes those JVMs to occassionally crash with SIGSEGV
during backport stress tests,
particularly MapLoops and MapChecks. It is therefore recommended to use JVM versions
1.4.2_06 or newer when using the backport (although the crashes seem to not happen also
on 1.4.2_03, and perhaps on earlier JVMs). Detected in version: 2.0.
</p>
<p>
<strong>Note: </strong>due to what is apparently a bug in SUN JVM implementations
for Solaris, observed on 1.4.2_03 and 1.4.2_06,
the 'ExecutorsTest.testPrivilegedThreadFactory()'
unit test fails with ClassNotFoundException when launched from a class path
that has backport classes stored as individual files in the "classes" directory. The
problem disappears when the classes are put in a JAR file. The bug is most likely
related to handling context class loaders. It is therefore advised to use JAR
files instead of class files when running code that explicitly or implicitly
modifies context class loaders, as does privileged thread factory.
Detected in version: 2.0.
</p>
<p>
<strong>Note: </strong>missed signals have been observed on Linux 2.6.3-7 kernel
for SMP w/64GB support under contention and in the presence of frequent timeouts.
(The bug was captured during TimeoutProducerConsumerLoops on SynchronousQueue).
Apparently, this is caused by a kernel bug. The problem have been observed on
several different JVMs. It does not occur on newer kernels.
Detected in version: 2.0.
</p>
<p>
As evident from the above, IT IS CRUCIAL THAT YOU RUN THE STRESS TESTS on the
target configuration before using the backport in a production environment.
Concurrency issues are tricky, and possible bugs in JVMs, operating systems,
and this software, usually won't show up until under heavy loads. Stress tests
included with this distribution test this software under extreme conditions,
so if they are consistently passing, there's a very good chance that everything
works fine.
</p>
<h2>Changelog</h2>
<p>
Version 3.1 (Jul 5, 2006)<br>
SVN logs:
[<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-3.1/backport-util-concurrent-3.1-changelog.html">Java 1.4</a>,
<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-3.1/backport-util-concurrent-Java12-3.1-changelog.html">Java 1.2 - 1.3</a>,
<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-3.1/backport-util-concurrent-Java50-3.1-changelog.html">Java 5.0</a>,
<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-3.1/backport-util-concurrent-Java60-3.1-changelog.html">Java 6.0</a>]
<ul>
<li>New features</li>
<ul>
<li>Version for Java 6.0 available! The 5.0 and 6.0 version matches the performance of java.util.concurrent.</li>
<li>Javadoc clarifications and small improvements, following JSR 166.</li>
</ul>
<li>Bug fixes</li>
<ul>
<li>6523756: ThreadPoolExecutor shutdownNow vs execute race.</li>
<li>6464365: FutureTask.{set,setException} not called by run().</li>
<li>6529795: (coll)Iterator.remove() fails if next() threw NoSuchElementException.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
Version 3.0 (Nov 11, 2006)<br>
SVN logs:
[<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-3.0/backport-util-concurrent-3.0-changelog.html">Java 1.4</a>,
<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-3.0/backport-util-concurrent-Java50-3.0-changelog.html">Java 5.0</a>,
<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-3.0/backport-util-concurrent-Java12-3.0-changelog.html">Java 1.2 - 1.3</a>]
<ul>
<li>New features</li>
<ul>
<li>Versions for Java 1.2, 1.3, and 5.0 available! The 5.0 version matches the performance of java.util.concurrent.</li>
<li>Unit tests now support JUnit's graphical interface.</li>
<li>Added missing methods in TimeUnit to fully emulate enumeration functionality. Patch contributed by Andy Gerwick.</li>
<li>A few small optimizations: better hash function in ConcurrentHashMap, better toArray in views of ConcurrentSkipListMap</li>
<li>Many Javadoc clarifications, following JSR 166.</li>
</ul>
<li>Bug fixes</li>
<ul>
<li>Reconcillation with JSR 166 code base: refactored thread pools, fixing many minor problems, including 6440728, 6435792, improve shutdownNow guarantees, Don't create thread when terminated, Make isTerminating match spec, Preserve core pool size when tasks encounter exceptions, Distinguish throws of RuntimeExceptions vs Errors.</li>
<li>Class CheckedMap not serializable. Thanks to Xavier Le Vourch for finding the bug and contributing the fix.</li>
<li>Subtle inconsistency with JSR166 in what type of exception is thrown when one tries to release non-owned RRWL. Thanks to Jesse Wilson for reporting this bug.</li>
<li>Missing signals in condition.awaitUninterruptibly on some platforms. Thanks to Piccand Régis for reporting this bug.
</ul>
</ul>
Version 2.2 (Jun 4, 2006) [<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-2.2/backport-util-concurrent-2.2-changelog.html">CVS log</a>]
<ul>
<li>New features</li>
<ul>
<li>The backport now compiles under Java 5.0.</li>
<li>Enhancements in the Navigable[Map,Set] interfaces.</li>
<li>Blocking atomic multi-acquires in fair semaphores.</li>
<li>Javadoc enhancements (reconciled with recent java.util.concurrent).</li>
<li>Shutdown upon finalization for factory-created executors.</li>
</ul>
<li>Bug fixes</li>
<ul>
<li>broken type-checked map in Collections. Thanks for Taras Puchko for finding this bug
and submitting the fix.</li>
<li>Collections.reverseComparator(Comparator) not working properly when null passed as
the argument.</li>
</ul>
<li>Tests</li>
<ul>
<li>Updated and reconciled with java.util.concurrent tests.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
Version 2.1 (Jan 28, 2006) [<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-2.1/backport-util-concurrent-2.1-changelog.html">CVS log</a>]
<ul>
<li>New features</li>
<ul>
<li>Descending iterators in deques</li>
<li>Use newTaskFor() in ExecutionCompletionService.submit()</li>
<li>toArray(Object[]) appends null at the end in LinkedBlockingQueue</li>
<li>Overflow detection in ReentrantLock</li>
<li>ReentrantReadWriteLock: better conformance with JSR 166 by adding public inner classes for ReadLock and WriteLock</li>
<li>CopyOnWriteArraySet.equals() optimized towards small sets</li>
<li>Snapshot iterators in queues</li>
<li>Improved performance of toArray() in several collection classes</li>
<li>More collection stuff ported, including new things in Arrays, and base collection classes with toArray() supporting
concurrent collections</li>
<li>Improved comparison of ScheduledFutureTasks in the ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor</li>
</ul>
<li>Licensing</li>
<ul>
<li>New, public domain implementations for CopyOnWriteArrayList, TreeMap, TreeSet, LinkedList, Collections, Arrays</li>
</ul>
<li>Bug fixes</li>
<ul>
<li>Methods equals() and hashCode() were broken in PriorityQueue. The fix allows PriorityQueues to be used as hash keys.</li>
<li>ReentrantReadWriteLock.getWriteHoldCount could return a posititive value even if the write lock was not owned by the inquiring thread</li>
<li>Condition variables were not working properly with reentrant locks when the hold count was greater than 1. Await methods were releasing only a single hold, not all of them, as they should</li>
<li>Handling of non-comparable entries (which is an erroneous condition) by priority queues has been made more
deterministic. (This issue/fix does not affect correctly written programs)</li>
<li>Fix of CR 6312056 (ConcurrentHashMap.entrySet().iterator() can return entry with never-existent value)</li>
<li>Livelock in Exchanger if used by more than two threads</li>
<li>Erroneous behavior of interrupted CyclicBarrier and locks on some (buggy) JVMs (thanks to Yew-Yap Goh for
reporting this)</li>
</ul>
<li>Tests</li>
<ul>
<li>New and improved "loops" tests, including CollectionLoops, IteratorLoops, StringMapLoops,
TSPExchangerTest, TimeoutExchangerLoops, UnboundedQueueFillEmptyLoops, EntryTest</li>
<li>New "serial compatibility" test</li>
</ul>
</ul>
Version 2.0_01 (Aug 3, 2005) [<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-2.0_01/backport-util-concurrent-2.0_01-changelog.html">CVS log</a>]
<ul>
<li>Compatibility fix: ConcurrentHashMap was no longer inheriting from java.util.AbstractMap, although it was in version 1.1_01. Now it does again.</li>
<li>Licensing: new, public-domain implementation of PriorityQueue, and refactoring of backported AbstractMap so that it also contains only the public domain code.</li>
</ul>
Version 2.0 (Jul 6, 2005) [<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-2.0/backport-util-concurrent-2.0-changelog.html">CVS log</a>]
<ul>
<li>New features</li>
<ul>
<li>Features and fixes resulting from reconcillation with JSR 166 as of Jul 4,
such as:
lazySet in atomics,
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/AbstractExecutorService.html#newTaskFor(java.lang.Runnable, java.lang.Object)">AbstractExecutorService.newTaskFor()</a>,
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/RunnableFuture.html">RunnableFuture</a>,
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/RunnableScheduledFuture.html">RunnableScheduledFuture</a>,
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.html#decorateTask(java.lang.Runnable, edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.RunnableScheduledFuture)">ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.decorateTask()</a>,
better interrupt detection in ThreadPoolExecutor, avoiding garbage retention
with timeouts in SynchronousQueue, fixed reset in CyclicBarrier,
remove(x,null) -> false in ConcurrentHashMap, changes in navigable maps,
addAll fixed in CopyOnWriteArrayList, etc.
</li>
<li>New backported classes:
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentLinkedQueue.html">ConcurrentLinkedQueue</a>,
ConcurrentSkipList[<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentSkipListMap.html">Map</a>,<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentSkipListSet.html">Set</a>]</li>
<li>Optimizations (replacement of ReentrantLock by synchronized) in:
CyclicBarrier, DelayQueue, Exchanger, ThreadPoolExecutor</li>
<li>Optimizations of atomic variables (simple reads are now volatile rather than
synchronized)</li>
<li>New backported methods in the fair implementation of the ReentrantLock:
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock.html#hasWaiters(edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)">hasWaiters(Condition)</a>,
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock.html#getWaitQueueLength(edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)">getWaitQueueLength(Condition)</a>,
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock.html#getWaitingThreads(edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)">getWaitingThreads(Condition)</a></li>
<li>Retrofitted collection classes:
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/AbstractMap.html">AbstractMap</a>,
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/Collections.html">Collections</a>,
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/LinkedList.html">LinkedList</a>,
Tree[<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/TreeMap.html">Map</a>,<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/TreeSet.html">Set</a>]</li>
<li>Numerous javadoc clarifications and fixes</li>
</ul>
<li>Bug fixes</li>
<ul>
<li>Upon deserialization, ReentrantLock, ReentrantReadWriteLock, and Semaphore
were potentially in a locked (or even illegal) state, contrary to the javadoc</li>
<li>In the fair implementation of ReentrantLock, wait queues of <em>condition variables</em>
were not actually fair - they are now</li>
<li>LinkedBlockingQueue had potential deadlocks in remove() and toArray(). It has
now been replaced by a completely new implementation, based on java.u.c (rather
than dl.u.c)</li>
<li>Race condition in Condition.awaitUninterruptibly() could cause signals to be
missed if they were coinciding with interrupt attempts</li>
</ul>
<li>Tests</li>
<ul>
<li>Updated unit tests for atomics, AbstractQueuedSynchonizer, ConcurrentHashMap,
CyclicBarrier, ExecutorCompletionService, LinkedBlockingQueue, ReentrantLock,
ReentrantReadWriteLock, ScheduledExecutor, ThreadPoolExecutor</li>
<li>New unit tests for ConcurrentLinkedQueue, ConcurrentSkipList[Map,Set],
Utils.nanoTime(), LinkedList, Tree[Map,Set]</li>
<li>Updated numerous stress tests, and new ones added: CachedThreadPoolLoops,
[Collection,Map]WordLoops, CASLoops, and more</li>
</ul>
</ul>
Version 1.1_01 (Feb 7, 2005) [<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-1.1_01/backport-util-concurrent-1.1_01-changelog.html">CVS log</a>]
<ul>
<li>Bugfix: race condition in the fair implementation of ReentrantLock
caused it to occassionally cause IllegalMonitorState exceptions. Non-fair
implementation was not affected, however, classes that depend on fair reentrant locks,
namely: fair ArrayBlockingQueue, fair SynchronousQueue, and PriorityQueue, were
affected.
Thanks to Ramesh Nethi for reporting this bug and helping to track it down.</li>
<li>Testing: backport has been stress-tested using the "loops" tests
(courtesy of Doug Lea and the JSR 166 Expert Group). The tests
are included in the development source bundle.</li>
</ul>
Version 1.1 (Jan 21, 2005) [<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-1.1/backport-util-concurrent-1.1-changelog.html">CVS log</a>]
<ul>
<li>Bugfix: on Windows platforms with Java 1.4.2, the library
were sometimes behaving as if timeouts were ignored or misinterpreted,
typically resulting in indefinite waits. This resulted from an internal
timer overflow that occurred every several hours, and was also manifested
as a discontinuity in System.nanoTime() values. The problem would happen
if the overflow occurred during blocked timed wait, if additionally
a spurious wakeup occurred after the overflow but before timeout
in the underlying Object.wait().
This has now been fixed; 1.0_01 users are urged to upgrade to version 1.1.
Thanks to Ramesh Nethi for reporting this bug and greatly contributing
to tracking it down.</li>
<li>Feature: backport has been reconciled with JSR 166 CVS repository
on Jan 14, 2005. This results in a handful of new things:
<ul>
<li>New
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/TimeUnit.html">time units</a>:
MINUTES, HOURS, and DAYS.</li>
<li><a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.html#allowCoreThreadTimeOut(boolean)">allowCoreThreadTimeOut</a>
in ThreadPoolExecutor, which enables <em>bounded</em>
pools that kills threads if they are idle for too long.</li>
<li>ThreadPoolExecutor now handles excessive interruption requests more gracefully
(previously, it was reported to be able to crash older JVMs).</li>
<li><a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/Deque.html">Deques</a>.</li>
<li>Javadoc improvements.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
Version 1.0_01 (Dec 28, 2004) [<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/dcl/util/backport-util-concurrent/dist/backport-util-concurrent-1.0_01/backport-util-concurrent-1.0_01-changelog.html">CVS log</a>]
<ul>
<li>Feature: development source bundle with ant scripts allowing to build and
test the distribution is now available for download.</li>
<li>Feature: emulation of UncaughtExceptionHandler, in class
<a href="doc/api/edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/util/concurrent/helpers/ThreadHelpers.html">ThreadHelpers</a>.</li>
<li>Documentation: improved, more consistent and accurate javadoc.</li>
<li>Bugfix: NoClassDefFoundError when using nanoTime() on Java prior to 1.4.2.
Thanks to Gabriel Wolosin for reporting this bug.</li>
<li>Bugfix: deadlocks in ConcurrentLinkedQueue when drainTo() or clear() was
invoked when there was blocked put(). Thanks to Jean Morissette for
reporting this bug.</li>
<li>Bugfix: minor glitch in Utils.nanoTime() would cause timer to lose
accuracy, about 1ns every 11 days, if JVM was running continuously.
(Note: as it turned out, the fix itself had a bug; see the log for
version 1.1)</li>
</ul>
Version 1.0 (Dec 1, 2004)
<ul>
<li>Initial revision</li>
</ul>
<h2>Documentation and Support</h2>
<p>
For more information:
<ul>
<LI><a href="doc/api/">Browse Javadoc</a></LI>
<LI>Consult the original
<a href="http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/concurrency-interest/">
java.util.concurrent</a> documentation and Java 5.0
<a href="http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/concurrency/overview.html">Concurrency Utilities Overview</a></LI>
<li>Check the <a href="http://dcl.mathcs.emory.edu/util/backport-util-concurrent/">project Web page</a> for updates.</li>
<li>For questions, comments, and discussion, use the
<a href="http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/concurrency-interest">Concurrency-Interest
mailing list</a> (courtesy of Doug Lea and the JSR 166 Expert Group). Please clearly indicate
that your message regards the backport rather than the original JSR 166 API, by prefixing
the subject line with "backport: " and including appropriate annotation in the message body.
You may also send an e-mail directly to dawid.kurzyniec at gmail.com.</a>.</li>
</ul>
</p>
<hr>
<a href="http://dcl.mathcs.emory.edu/">Distributed Computing Laboratory</a>, Emory University<br>
<a href="http://google.com/">Google, Inc.</a><br>
</body>
</html>
