Sophie

Sophie

distrib > Mandriva > 10.0 > i586 > media > contrib > by-pkgid > fb56c4fbc1cfd325fb45601d494265ac > files > 1

dante-1.1.14-2mdk.i586.rpm

# $Id: socks.conf,v 1.28 2001/12/12 13:56:42 karls Exp $
#
# A sample socks.conf

# The configfile is divided into two parts; first misc. settings,
# then the routes.  Objects in '[]' are optional.
#
#
# recommended order is:
#	[debug]
#	[logoutput]
#	[resolveprotocol]
#
#	routes:
#		from to via
#		[command]
#		[extension]
#		[protocol]
#		[proxyprotocol]


#debug: 1           # uncomment to enable debugging

#logoutput: stdout  # users usually don't want to be bothered with that.

# What protocol should be used for resolving hostnames?  It's important
# to set this right.
#resolveprotocol: udp  # default
#resolveprotocol: tcp  # set this if your socksserver only supports socksv4.
#resolveprotocol: fake # set this if your clients can't access nameserver,
		       # neither directly nor proxied.



#
# the routes
#

# specifying routes for accepting remote connections (via bind()) is
# difficult since we can't know what the "to:" address is
# until we actually get the connection  Since we support letting
# the client accept connections both via the proxyserver and
# "directly" at the same time, we have two options though:
# a) specify a route for bind (only) first going via the proxyserver.
#    This will also handle "direct" connections.
# b) specify a route for bind (only) first going "direct".
#    This means clients will only be able to accept "direct"
#    connections.

# we want to accept remote connections via the proxyserver.
#route {
#	from: 0.0.0.0/0 to: 0.0.0.0/0 via: 10.1.1.1 port = 1080
#	command: bind
#}

# we do not want to accept remote connections via the proxyserver.
#route {
#	from: 0.0.0.0/0 to: 0.0.0.0/0 via: direct
#	command: bind
#}


# if you don't route all local connections via direct, you should
# at least route nameserver connections via direct connections if you
# can.  That can make for much better performance, depending on
# your setup.  Make sure the nameserver line is the first.
#
# Assuming your nameserver runs on address 10.1.1.1, you can do it like this:
#route {
#	from: 0.0.0.0/0 to: 10.1.1.1/32 port = domain via: direct
#}


# have a route making all connections to loopback addresses be direct.
#route {
#	from: 0.0.0.0/0   to: 127.0.0.0/8  via: direct
#	command: connect udpassociate # everything but bind, bind confuses us.
#}

# Our net is the 10.0.0.0/8 net, let clients going to local address go
# direct, not via server.
#route {
#	from: 0.0.0.0/0   to: 10.0.0.0/8   via: direct
#}

# for poor souls trapped behind a msproxy server.
#route {
#	from: 0.0.0.0/0   to: 0.0.0.0/0   via: 10.1.1.1 port = 1745
#	protocol: tcp			 # server supports tcp
#	proxyprotocol: msproxy_v2        # server runs msproxy_v2
#}

# clients going anywhere else go via server listening at
# IP address 10.1.1.1, port 1080.   Note that unless you have
# specified a direct connection for DNS, or the socksserver is resolvable
# without network traffic, you can't give a hostname for the socksserver,
# you must give a IP address.  (the reasons for that are logical enough,
# you would create a loop otherwise.)
#route {
#	from: 0.0.0.0/0   to: 0.0.0.0/0   via: 10.1.1.1 port = 1080
#	protocol: tcp udp                # server supports tcp and udp.
#	proxyprotocol: socks_v4 socks_v5 # server supports socks v4 and v5.
#	method: none #username		 # we are willing to authenticate via
#					 # method "none", not "username".
#}

# this is identical to the above, but it matches hostnames instead.
# This is if you have clients that are unable to resolve hostnames.
# It can be important that hostname routes come after address routes.
#route {
#	from: 0.0.0.0/0   to: .   via: 10.1.1.1 port = 1080
#	protocol: tcp udp                # server supports tcp and udp.
#	proxyprotocol: socks_v4 socks_v5 # server supports socks v4 and v5.
#	method: none #username		 # we are willing to authenticate via
#					 # method "none", not "username".
#}

# identical to above two routes, but using a httpproxy instead.
#

#route {
#	from: 0.0.0.0/0   to: 0.0.0.0/0   via: 10.1.1.1 port = 3128
#	command: connect		 # only thing a httproxy supports.
#	proxyprotocol: http_v1.0
#}

#route {
#	from: 0.0.0.0/0   to: .   via: 10.1.1.1 port = 3128
#	command: connect		 # only thing a httproxy supports.
#	proxyprotocol: http_v1.0
#}