Sophie

Sophie

distrib > Mandriva > 9.1 > i586 > by-pkgid > 0195c26144d6a6d8437da6bf9d0aeff3 > files > 101

zsh-doc-4.1.0-0.dev5.4mdk.i586.rpm

<html>
<head>
<title>A User's Guide to the Z-Shell </title>
</head>
<body  >
<hr>
<ul>
    <li> <a href="zshguide02.html">Next chapter</a>
    <li> <a href="zshguide.html">Table of contents</a>
</ul>
<hr>

<a name="intro"></a><a name="l1"></a>
<h1>Chapter 1: A short introduction</h1>
<p>The Z-Shell, `zsh' for short, is a command interpreter for UNIX systems,
or in UNIX jargon, a `shell', because it wraps around the commands you use.
More than that, however, zsh is a particularly powerful shell --- and it's
free, and under regular maintenance --- with lots of interactive features
allowing you to do the maximum work with the minimum fuss.  Of course, for
that you need to know what the shell can do and how, and that's what this
guide is for.
<p>The most basic basics: I shall assume you have access to a UNIX system,
otherwise the rest of this is not going to be much use.  You can also use
zsh under Windows by installing Cygwin, which provids a UNIX-like
environment for programmes --- given the weakness of the standard Windows
command interpreter, this is a good thing to do.  There are ports of older
versions of zsh to Windows which run natively, i.e. without a UNIX
environment, although these have a slightly different behaviour in some
respects and I won't talk about them further.
<p>I'll also assume some basic knowledge of UNIX; you should know how the
filesystem works, i.e. what <code>/home/users/pws/.zshrc</code> and <code>../file</code>
mean, and some basic commands, for example <code>ls</code>, and you should have
experience with using <code>rm</code> to delete completely the wrong file by
accident, and that sort of thing.  In something like `<code>rm file</code>', I will
often refer to the `command' (<code>rm</code>, of course) and the `argument(s)'
(anything else coming after the command which is used by it), and to the
complete thing you typed in one go as the `command line'.
<p>You're also going to need zsh itself; if you're reading this, you may well
already have it, but if you don't, you or your system administrator should
read <a href="zshguide08.html#appa">Appendix A</a>.  For now, we'll suppose you're sitting in
front of a terminal with zsh already running.
<p>Now to the shell.  After you log in, you probably see some prompt (a
series of symbols on the screen indicating that you can input a command),
such as `<code>$</code>' or `<code>%</code>', possibly with some other text in front ---
later, we'll see how you can change that text in interesting ways.  That
prompt comes from the shell.  Type `<code>print hello</code>', then backspace over
`<code>hello</code>' and type `<code>goodbye</code>'.  Now hit the `Return' key (or `Enter'
key, I'll just say <code>&lt;RET&gt;</code> from now on, likewise <code>&lt;TAB&gt;</code> for the tab
key, <code>&lt;SPC&gt;</code> for the space key); unless you have a serious
practical-joker problem on your system, you will see `<code>goodbye</code>', and
the shell will come back with another prompt.  All of the time up to when
you hit <code>&lt;RET&gt;</code>, you were interacting with the shell and its editor,
called `Z-Shell Line Editor' or `zle' for short; only then did the shell go
away and tell the <code>print</code> command to print out a message.  So you can see
that the shell is important.
<p>However, if all you're doing is typing simple commands like that, why do
you need anything complicated?  In that case, you don't; but real life's
not that simple.  In the rest of this guide, I describe how, with zsh's
help, you can:
<dl>
  <p></p><dt><strong></strong><dd> customise the environment in which you work, by using startup files,
  <p></p><dt><strong></strong><dd> write your own commands to shorten tasks and store things in
     shell variables (`parameters') so you don't have to remember them,
  <p></p><dt><strong></strong><dd> use zle to minimise the amount of typing you have to do ---
     in zsh, you can even edit small files that way,
  <p></p><dt><strong></strong><dd> pick the files you want to use for a particular command such
     as <code>mv</code> or <code>ls</code> using zsh's very sophisticated filename generation
     (known colloquially as `globbing') system,
  <p></p><dt><strong></strong><dd> tell the editor what sort of arguments you use with particular
     commands, so that you only need to type part of the name and it will
     complete the rest, using zsh's unrivalled programmable completion
     system,
  <p></p><dt><strong></strong><dd> use the extra add-ons (`modules') supplied with the latest version
     of zsh to do other things you usually can't do in a shell at all.
</dl>
That's only a tiny sample.  Since there's so much to say, this guide will
concentrate on the things zsh does best, and in particular the things it
has which other shells don't.  The next chapter gives a few of the basics,
by trying to explain how to set the shell up the way you want it.  Like the
rest of the guide, it's not intended to be exhaustive, for which you should
look at the shell manual.
<p>Some other things you should probably know straight away.  First, the shell
is always running, even when the command you typed is running, too; the
shell simply hangs around waiting for it to finish: you may know from other
shells about putting commands in the <strong>background</strong> by putting an `<code>&amp;</code>'
after the command, which means that the shell doesn't wait for them to
finish.  The shell is there even if the command's in the foreground, but in
this case doing nothing.
<p>Second, it doesn't just run other people's commands, it has some of its
own, called <strong>builtin commands</strong> or just <strong>builtins</strong>, and you can even add
your own commands as lists of instructions to the shell called
<strong>functions</strong>; builtins and functions always run in the shell itself.
That's important to know, because things which don't run in the shell
itself can't affect it, and hence can't alter parameters, functions,
aliases, and all the other things I shall talk about.
<p><a name="l2"></a>
<h2>1.1: Other shells and other guides</h2>
<p>If you want a basic grounding in how shells work, what their syntax is
(i.e. how to write commands), and how to write scripts and functions, you
should read one of the many books on the subject.  In particular, you will
get most out of a book that describes the Korn shell (ksh), as zsh is very
similar to this --- so similar that it will be worth my while pointing out
differences as we go along, since they can confuse ksh users.  Recent
versions of zsh can emulate ksh (strictly, the 1988 version of ksh,
although there are increasingly features from the 1993 version) quite
closely, although it's not perfect, and less perfect the more closely you
look.  However, it's important to realise that if you just start up any old
zsh there is no guarantee that it will be set up to work like ksh; unless
you or your system adminstrator have changed some settings, it certainly
won't be.  You might not see that straight away, but it affects the shell
in subtle ways.  I will talk about emulation a bit more later on.
<p>A few other shells are worth mentioning.  The grandfather of all UNIX
shells is sh, now known as the Bourne shell but originally just referred to
as `the shell'.  The story is similar to ksh: zsh can emulate sh quite
closely (much more closely than ksh, since sh is considerably simpler), but
in general you need to make sure it's set up to do that before you can be
sure it will emulate sh.
<p>You may also come across the `Bourne-Again Shell', bash.  This is a
freely-available enhancement of sh written by the GNU project --- but it is
not always enhanced along the lines of ksh, and hence in many ways it is
very different from zsh.  On some free UNIX-like systems such as Linux/GNU
(which is what people usually mean by Linux), the command sh is really
bash, so there you should be extra careful when trying to ensure that
something which runs under the so-called `sh' will also run under zsh.
Some Linux systems also have another simpler Bourne shell clone, ash; as
it's simpler, it's more like the original Bourne shell.
<p>Some more modern operating systems talk about `the POSIX shell'.  This is
an attempt to standardize UNIX shells; it's most like the Korn shell,
although, a bit confusingly, it's often just called sh, because the
standard says that it should be.  Usually, this just means you get a bit
extra free with your sh and it still does what you expect.  Zsh has made
some attempts to fit the standard, but you have to tell it to --- again,
simply starting up `zsh' will not have the right settings for that.
<p>There is another common family of shells with, unfortunately, incompatible
syntax.  The source of this family is the C-Shell, csh, so called because
its syntax looks more like the C programming language.  This became
widespread when the only other shell available was sh because csh had better
interactive features, such as job control.  It was then enhanced to make
tcsh, which has many of the interactive features you will also find in zsh,
and so became very popular.  Despite these common features, the syntax of
zsh is very different, so you should not try and use csh/tcsh commands
beyond the very simplest in zsh; but if you are a tcsh user, you will find
virtually every capability you are used to in zsh somewhere, plus a lot
more.
<p><a name="l3"></a>
<h2>1.2: Versions of zsh</h2>
<p>At the time of writing, the most recent version of zsh available for
widespread use was 4.0.1, the first release of zsh 4.  You will commonly
find two sets of older zsh's around.  The 3.0 series, of which the last
release was 3.0, was a stable release, with only bug fixes since the first
release of zsh 3.  The 3.1 series were beta versions, with lots of new
features; the last of these, 3.1.9, was not so different from 4.0.1; the
main change is that the shell has now been declared stable, so that as with
zsh 3 there will be a set of bug fixes, labelled 4.0, and a set with new
functions in, labelled 4.1.  As 4.0.1 replaces all zsh 3 versions, I will
try to keep things simple and talk about that; but every now and then it
will be helpful to point out where older versions were different.
<p>One notable feature of zsh is the completion of command line arguments.
The system changed in 3.1.6 and 3.1.7 to make it a lot more configurable,
and (provided you keep your wits about you) a little less obscure.  I
therefore won't describe the old completion system, which used the
`compctl' command, in any detail; a very brief introduction is given in the
zsh FAQ.  The old system remains available, however we strongly recommend
new users to start with the new one.  See the chapter `Completion, old and
new' for the lowdown on new-style completion.
<p><a name="l4"></a>
<h2>1.3: Conventions</h2>
<p>Most of what I say will be reasonably self-contained (which means I use
phrases like `as I said before' and `as I'll discuss later on' more than a
real stylist would like), but there are some points I should perhaps draw
your attention to before you leap in.
<p>I will often write chunks of code as you would put them in a file for
execution (a `script' or a `function', the differences to be discussed
<em>passim</em>):
<pre>

  if [[ $ZSH_VERSION = 3.* ]]; then
    print This is a release of the third version of zsh.
  else
    print This is either very new or very old.
  fi

</pre>

but sometimes I will show both what you type into a shell interactively,
and what the shell throws back at you:
<pre>

  % print $ZSH_VERSION
  3.1.9
  % print $CPUTYPE
  i586

</pre>

Here, `<code>%</code>' shows the prompt the shell puts up to tell you it is
expecting input (and the space immediately after is part of it).  Actually,
you probably see something before the percent sign like the name of the
machine or your user name, or maybe something fancier.  I've pruned it to
the minimum to avoid confusion, and kept it as reminder that this is the
line you type.
<p>If you're reading an electronic version of this guide, and want to copy
lines with the `<code>%</code>' in front into a terminal to be executed, there's a
neat way of doing this where you don't even have to edit the line first:
<pre>

  alias %=' '

</pre>

Then <code>%</code> at the start of a line is turned into nothing whatsoever; the
space just indicates that any following aliases should be expanded.  So the
line `<code>% print $CPUTYPE</code>' will ignore the `<code>%</code>' and execute the rest of
the line.  (I hope it's obvious, but your <em>own</em> prompt is always ignored;
this is just if you copy the prompts from the guide into the shell.)
<p>There are lots of different types of object in zsh, but two of the most
common are parameters, which I will always show with a `<code>$</code>' sign in
front, like `<code>$ZSH_VERSION</code>', to remind you they are parameters.  You
need to remember that when you're setting or fiddling with the parameter
itself, rather than its value, you omit the `<code>$</code>'.  When you do and don't
need it should become clearer as we go along.
<p>The other objects I'll show specially are shell options --- choices about
how the shell is to work --- which I write like this: `<code>SH_WORD_SPLIT</code>',
`<code>NO_NOMATCH</code>', `<code>ZLE</code>'.  Again, that's not the whole story since
whenever the shell expects options you can write them in upper or lower
case with as many or as few underscores as you like; and often in code
chunks I'll use the simplest form instead: `<code>shwordsplit</code>',
`<code>nonomatch</code>', `<code>zle</code>'.  If you're philosophical you can think of it as
expressing the category difference between talking about programming and
actual programming, but really it's just me being inconsistent.
<p><a name="l5"></a>
<h2>1.4: Acknowledgments</h2>
<p>I am grateful for comments from various zsh users.  In particular, I have
had detailed comments and corrections from Bart Schaefer, Sven `Mr
Completion' Wischnowsky and Oliver Kiddle.  It's usual to add that any
remaining errors are my own, but that's so stark staringly obvious as to be
ridiculous.  I mean, who wrote this?  Never mind.
<p>Most of this written on one or another release of Linux Mandrake (a
derivative of Red Hat), with the usual GNU and XFree86 tools.  Since all of
this was free, it only seems fair to say `thank you' for the gift.

<p><a name="c2"></a>
    

<hr>
<ul>
    <li> <a href="zshguide02.html">Next chapter</a>
    <li> <a href="zshguide.html">Table of contents</a>
</ul>
<hr>
</body>
</html>